GeForce 256

GeForce 256 started the GeForce brand and made hardware transform and lighting the headline PC graphics feature.

Reference GPU

Celsius NV10 GeForce 256 Collector / Retro Desktop Flagship High End Desktop DDR SDR SGRAM 1999

Add to comparison

Save this GPU, then open another GPU page to compare them side by side.

At a Glance

Entry Type: Reference GPU
Architecture: Celsius
Series: GeForce 256
GPU Die: NV10
Launch Date: 1999-10-11
Launch MSRP: About $249 to $299 for early 32 MB boards, depending on partner and memory type
Memory: 32 MB typical; some later board-partner variants used 64 MB SDR SDRAM or SGRAM on early cards; DDR SDRAM or DDR SGRAM on later DDR cards
Bus Width: 128-bit
TDP/TBP: About 12 to 13 W class, depending on SDR or DDR board design
Interface: AGP 2x / AGP 4x depending on board and platform
Data Confidence: Partial

GPU Specs

What do these fields mean?Partial

Identity
Entry Type	Reference GPU
Official Name	NVIDIA GeForce 256
GPU Codename	NV10
Architecture	Celsius / NV10 fixed-function DirectX 7 GPU with hardware transform and lighting
Launch Date	1999-10-11
Launch MSRP	About $249 to $299 for early 32 MB boards, depending on partner and memory type
Market Segment Notes	High-end desktop gaming and enthusiast 3D graphics
Core Specs
GPU Die	NV10
Process Node	TSMC 220 nm
Transistor Count	About 17 million in GPU database sources; some launch-era coverage quoted nearly 23 million for the broader GeForce 256 chip description
Die Size	About 139 mm2
CUDA Cores	0
SM Count	0
Base Clock	120 MHz
Boost Clock	Not applicable
Memory
Memory Size	32 MB typical; some later board-partner variants used 64 MB
Memory Type	SDR SDRAM or SGRAM on early cards; DDR SDRAM or DDR SGRAM on later DDR cards
Memory Bus Width	128-bit
Memory Clock	166 MHz SDR on SDR boards; 150 MHz DDR clock, 300 MT/s effective, on DDR boards
Memory Bandwidth	2.656 GB/s on SDR boards; 4.8 GB/s on DDR boards
Board and Display
TDP / TBP	About 12 to 13 W class, depending on SDR or DDR board design
Power Connectors	None
Interface	AGP 2x / AGP 4x depending on board and platform
Display Outputs	15-pin VGA on typical boards. Some board-partner designs exposed or provisioned DVI, S-Video or TV-out.
Slot Width	Single slot
Reference Cooler Type	Small active fan cooler on many boards; some partner designs vary
Software
CUDA Compute Capability	Not applicable. This predates CUDA.
DirectX Support	DirectX 7.0 with hardware transform and lighting
Vulkan Support	Not supported
OpenGL Support	OpenGL 1.2 class in period drivers
Driver Branch Notes	Period Windows 9x, Windows 2000 and early Windows XP Detonator or ForceWare-era drivers are the practical target. NVIDIA driver support for this generation ended long ago.
Windows Support Notes	Best matched with Windows 98 SE for period gaming. Windows 2000 and early 32-bit Windows XP can work with legacy drivers, but later Windows versions are not a practical target for 3D use.
Linux Support Notes	Only legacy NVIDIA driver stacks or older open-source display support are relevant. There is no practical modern accelerated Linux target.

Overview

GeForce 256 is the hinge between NVIDIA’s RIVA era and the GeForce line. Its historical importance comes from hardware transform and lighting, the GeForce brand launch, and the shift toward treating the graphics processor as more than a simple rasterizer.

The family is also a good example of why variant tracking matters. SDR and DDR boards share the same broad identity, but memory type and board partner have a real effect on period performance and collector interest.

Why It Mattered

GeForce 256 is a priority historical entry because NVIDIA used it to introduce the GeForce brand and popularize the term GPU around an integrated transform, lighting, setup, and rendering processor. The page should distinguish NVIDIA's launch framing from later, broader uses of the word GPU.

Launch Context

The launch context should cover the 1999 transition from late RIVA-era accelerators to the first GeForce-branded product, with NVIDIA's own anniversary material and archived product pages used as primary references where possible.

Performance Context

Performance context should be written only after period reviews are checked. Until then, keep this section limited to source-backed product positioning and avoid ranking language.

Architecture Context

Architecture notes should focus on the hardware transform and lighting claim, integrated rendering pipeline, and the limits of that fixed-function era. Avoid projecting later programmable shader or CUDA-era ideas onto this entry.

Collector Relevance

Collector notes should separate SDR and DDR retail cards, memory type, driver media, and board partner packaging only after archive or manual sources are attached.

Used-Market Caution

Confirm SDR versus DDR before buying, because the difference is meaningful. Also check AGP keying, cooler condition, output configuration, memory size, board-partner model, and whether the card has been modified.

Known Issues

The SDR model is often memory-bandwidth limited. DDR boards are more desirable but can be harder to find. Some launch-era claims and database sources disagree on transistor count, so the entry records both the common database figure and the higher launch-era quote.

Known Failure Points

Small cooler failure, AGP compatibility, and SDR-versus-DDR confusion are common. Driver support is legacy-only, and later Windows versions are not the right target for a clean period experience.

Driver and Platform Notes

Period Windows 9x, Windows 2000 and early Windows XP Detonator or ForceWare-era drivers are the practical target. NVIDIA driver support for this generation ended long ago.

Only legacy NVIDIA driver stacks or older open-source display support are relevant. There is no practical modern accelerated Linux target.

Best matched with Windows 98 SE for period gaming. Windows 2000 and early 32-bit Windows XP can work with legacy drivers, but later Windows versions are not a practical target for 3D use.

Compare with

Reviews1 review

Board-partner, reference-card, article, and video reviews that cover this GPU.

ArticleAnandTech

NVIDIA GeForce 256 Review

Early review coverage of the GeForce 256.

SourcesPartial

Sources reviewed: 2026-06-21

This entry is still being source-checked.

Source Status

Source review pending. Treat narrative notes as incomplete until listed sources are reviewed.

Pending source review topics:

why it mattered
launch context
performance context
competitive context
driver and platform notes
variant notes

Data confidence and source status

Partial entry. Core specifications may be present, but history, variant notes, known issues, and source review may be incomplete.

Verified: core specifications and historical notes have been reviewed against listed sources.
Partial: core specifications may be present, but history, variant notes, known issues, and source review may be incomplete.
Imported: spec-only imported entry pending editorial source review.
Needs source review: narrative notes are incomplete until reviewed.

Primary / manufacturer sources

NVIDIA corporate timeline 1999Official timeline entry for GeForce 256 launchOpen source
NVIDIA Blog GeForce 256 retrospectiveOfficial retrospective on GeForce 256 and hardware T&LOpen source
DOS Days GeForce 256 DDR retro reviewBoard-level DDR/SDR, AGP, memory, and collector notesOpen source
GeForce 256 graphics accelerator PDFPeriod GeForce 256 accelerator product materialOpen source
NVIDIA Windows XP/2000 91.47 driver pageNVIDIA support list and legacy support boundary for several GeForce2 and TNT2-era productsOpen source
NVIDIA Windows NT supported products pageNVIDIA legacy driver support note for TNT2, Vanta, GeForce 256, GeForce2 GTS/Pro/Ultra, and Quadro2Open source
IEEE Computer Society, Famous Graphics Chips: Nvidia's GeForce 256Secondary historical reference for terminology and architecture context.Open source
Internet Archive, NVIDIA GeForce 256 product pageArchived NVIDIA product page for primary historical checking.Open source

Found an incorrect spec, missing source, or variant issue?

Submit a correction