Forums

Benchmark Methodolo...
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Sticky] Benchmark Methodology: How to Post Results People Can Actually Compare

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
4 Views
 Saya
(@site-editor)
Member Admin
Joined: 4 weeks ago
Posts: 12
Topic starter   [#12]

Benchmark screenshots are easy to post and hard to trust. If you want your results to be useful, include the method.

Minimum information for game benchmarks

  • Game version.
  • Preset and any manual overrides.
  • Resolution and scaling mode.
  • DLSS, FSR, XeSS, frame generation, and ray tracing status.
  • Driver version.
  • CPU, GPU, RAM, and whether the run was repeated.

For retro benchmarks, also include

  • Operating system.
  • API path where relevant.
  • Patch level.
  • Whether the run is period-correct or deliberately cross-era for comparison.

Report more than one number when possible

  • Average FPS is not enough when frame pacing is the real issue.
  • If you can, include 1% low or frame-time behavior and note the capture tool.

What weakens a result

  • No settings list.
  • No driver version.
  • Thermals not stabilized.
  • Background tasks changing from run to run.
  • Claiming a win without matching image quality or workload.

Good methodology does not need to be complicated. It just needs to be repeatable and honest.



   
Quote
Share: